<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>1in100 &#187; CCHD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1in100.org/tag/cchd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1in100.org</link>
	<description>Know More. Do More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Consensus &#8211; AAP, AHA, ACC Endorse Screening Newborns for Heart Defects</title>
		<link>http://1in100.org/consensus-aap-aha-acc-endorse-screening-newborns-for-heart-defects/</link>
		<comments>http://1in100.org/consensus-aap-aha-acc-endorse-screening-newborns-for-heart-defects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asaarinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eve Saarinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal advisory committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse oximetry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1in100.org/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Published in the journal Pediatrics: Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, a federal advisory panel recommends nationwide screening for critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry, a probe placed on a hand and a foot that uses a light source and sensor to measure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Published in the journal Pediatrics: Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, a federal advisory panel recommends nationwide screening for critical congenital heart  disease using pulse oximetry, a probe placed on a hand and a foot that  uses a light source and sensor to measure oxygen in the blood. Low  oxygen levels signal the need for further testing to look for a  heart-related problem.</p>
<p>View the report here: <a href="http://1in100.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Newborn-Screening-CCHD_2011-1317.preprint.pdf">Newborn Screening for Heart Defects Using Pulse Oximetry Recommended</a></p>
<p>There are few words to describe the excitement.  Thinking back to <a href="http://1in100.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/UMACH_CVHeartCenter_v5.pdf">Eve&#8217;s Impact</a>, her diagnosis and surgeries &#8211; and on to that day in the fall of 2009, when the team in Minnesota agreed to pursue a pilot project, to discussing a federal nomination with the committee member, to providing comments to the federal advisory committee and participating in this federal workgroup that yielded this report..it&#8217;s been a whirlwind.  Now, all this news coverage in the past 24 hours.  It&#8217;s clear the time has come to use all the tools available to support the early detection of heart defects in newborns.</p>
<p>http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7377689n&#038;tag=mg;earlyshow</p>
<p>http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/21/health/la-he-heart-screening-20110822</p>
<p>http://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby/news/20110819/blood-oxygen-test-finds-heart-defects-in-newborns</p>
<p>http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/748382</p>
<p>http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/boostershots/la-he-heart-screening-20110822,0,1119997.story</p>
<p>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2015978538_webheart22.html</p>
<p>http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/rethinking-healthcare/could-a-new-screening-help-identify-heart-problems-for-newborns/6335</p>
<p>http://health.usnews.com/health-news/family-health/heart/articles/2011/08/22/steps-outlined-to-screen-all-newborns-for-heart-defects</p>
<p>http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2011/08/22/screening-newborns-for-congenital-heart-disease/?mod=WSJBlog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1in100.org/consensus-aap-aha-acc-endorse-screening-newborns-for-heart-defects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progress.</title>
		<link>http://1in100.org/progress/</link>
		<comments>http://1in100.org/progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asaarinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse oximetry screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walton Lillehei]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1in100.org/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the year leading up to July 19, 1955, C. Walton Lillehei and colleagues operated upon 45 infants and children with previously uncorrectable cardiac anomalies using cross-circulation with a human donor.  Actually, my grandmother, Anna, was the third adult patient he operated on using his revolutionary bypass techniques. In that spirit, I wanted to share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the year leading up to July 19, 1955, C. Walton Lillehei and colleagues operated upon 45 infants and children with previously uncorrectable cardiac anomalies using cross-circulation with a human donor.  Actually, my grandmother, Anna, was the third adult patient he operated on using his revolutionary bypass techniques.</p>
<p>In that spirit, I wanted to share this recent story from CNN online.  http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/22/darth-vaders-mom-we-focus-on-today/</p>
<p>Dr. Gupta highlights little Max, the Tetralogy of Fallot survivor who played Darth Vadar on the high profile SuperBowl ad.  His family&#8217;s advocacy stretches beyond CHD to patient access to pediatric specialty care.  It&#8217;s important to understand that not so many years ago, Max would never have survived TOF.  And the fact is that today, Max still may not have survived TOF without early diagnosis.  Made me curious about the informal survey findings shared at the January CCHD Implementation Workgroup meeting in DC.  I looked back and found that of the 68 patient families responding (all postnatal diagnosis), 12 were cases of TOF, a defect that would surely present with desaturation, if evaluated with pulse oximetry. Of those 3 babies were not diagnosed until after discharge from the nursery.</p>
<p>This country is waiting – today – for the U.S. Department of Health  and Human Services to adopt a formal recommendation already made by its  federal advisory committee to screen all newborns for Critical  Congenital Heart Defects before discharge from the hospital. Max was  diagnosed before birth (but just barely). Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF),  Max&#8217;s condition &#8211; is one of the most prominent heart defects that can be  detected with the help of pulse oximetry screening in the newborn  nursery. Babies around the country being born in hospitals where these  conditions are not seen very often will be helped, or saved, by early  diagnosis. It&#8217;s really just a simple vital sign check – non-invasive and  about the cost of a diaper change.</p>
<p>We continue to be hopeful that the federal guidance on this issue will  come very shortly &#8211; so critical for the advocates, and the provider and public health  communities who are continuing to move forward.</p>
<p>The statement from the federal  advisory committee can be viewed here:  http://www.hrsa.gov/heritabledisorderscommittee/correspondence/October15th2010letter.htm</p>
<p>More about the SACHDNC:<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.hrsa.gov/heritabledisorderscommittee/">http://www.hrsa.gov/heritabledisorderscommittee/</a></span></p>
<p>More about the SACHDNC: Workgroup on Screening for Critical Congenital Cyanotic Heart Disease<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://altarum.cvent.com/events/ccchd-meeting/custom-22-f8929dc795694e7aa6c588c263e31554.aspx">http://altarum.cvent.com/events/ccchd-meeting/custom-22-f8929dc795694e7aa6c588c263e31554.aspx</a></span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">SACHDNC letter to Secretary </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sebelius</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Recommending Newborn Screening for CCHD</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hrsa.gov/heritabledisorderscommittee/correspondence/October15th2010letter.htm">http://www.hrsa.gov/heritabledisorderscommittee/correspondence/October15th2010letter.htm</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Statement from AAP New Jersey on Pulse </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Oximetry</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> screening: </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">http://pulseoxadvocacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Bill-A3744-1.pdf</span></p>
<p>http://www.cchdscreeningmap.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1in100.org/progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Detection of CCHD &#8211; Pulse Oximetry Advocacy</title>
		<link>http://1in100.org/early-detection-of-cchd-pulse-oximetry-advocacy/</link>
		<comments>http://1in100.org/early-detection-of-cchd-pulse-oximetry-advocacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asaarinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulse ox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse oximetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1in100.org/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pulse Oximetry Advocacy Temporary Toolkit: Interactive screening map with current state legislation, legislation pending and hospitals screening for CCHD: http://www.cchdscreeningmap.com/ I. INITIAL OUTREACH TARGETS State Departments of Health Newborn Screening and/or birth defect surveillance divisions Hospital Medical Staff &#8211; contacts Pediatric Cardiology Neonatology Pediatrics Nursing Newborn nurseries/Labor &#38; Delivery Hospital Administration CEO Chief Financial Officer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><strong>Pulse Oximetry Advocacy Temporary Toolkit:</strong></p>
<p>Interactive screening map with current state legislation, legislation pending and hospitals screening for CCHD:</p>
<p>http://www.cchdscreeningmap.com/</p>
<p>I. INITIAL OUTREACH TARGETS</p>
<p><strong>State Departments of Health</strong></p>
<p>Newborn Screening and/or birth defect surveillance divisions</p>
<p><strong>Hospital Medical Staff &#8211; contacts</strong></p>
<p>Pediatric Cardiology<br />
Neonatology<br />
Pediatrics<br />
Nursing<br />
Newborn nurseries/Labor &amp; Delivery</p>
<p><strong>Hospital Administration</strong></p>
<p>CEO<br />
Chief Financial Officer<br />
Medical Director<br />
Nursing Executive Leadership<br />
Patient Safety/Patient Care</p>
<p><strong>Organizations</strong></p>
<p>AAP &#8211; State Chapter leadership  &#8211; <a href="http://www.aap.org/member/chapters/chaplist.cfm">AAP Chapters</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.aha.org/aha/colleagues/directory/index.html">Hospital Associations by State</a></p>
<p>America Heart Association (state chapter)</p>
<p><strong>Pediatric Heart Organizations /Sites (some with State Chapters)</strong></p>
<p>Mended Little Hearts<br />
It&#8217;s My Heart<br />
Lasting Imprint<br />
Congenital Heart Information Network<br />
Bless Her Heart<br />
Children&#8217;s Heart Foundation<br />
James&#8217; Project<br />
CHD Speaks<br />
BabyCenter Community: Babies and Children with Heart Problems<br />
Helping Hands, Healing Hearts<br />
CHD Babies<br />
II. INITIAL TALKING POINTS</p>
<p>Website and address of every hospital in the US, by state: <a href="http://hospitalandmedicalcentercompare.com/by-state" target="_blank">http://hospitalandmedicalcentercompare.com/by-state</a></p>
<p><strong>Draft Hospital Outreach Letter</strong></p>
<p><a href="../wp-content/uploads/2010/02/PULSE-OX_HOSPITAL_LTR_0210.doc"><strong>Click here</strong></a> for the Word document file.<strong>Letters sent in support of Newborn Screening for CCHD to the Department of Health and Human Services</strong></p>
<p><a title="Children's National Medical Center Letter" href="../wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Sebelius-Letter_Childrens-National.pdf">Children’s National Medical Center, Washington DC </a></p>
<p><a title="UMass, Dept of Pediatrics, Cardiology Letter" href="../wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Sebelius-letter.pdf">Darshak Sanghavi, M.D., UMass Memorial and University of Massachusetts Medical School Letter</a></p>
<p><a title="patient safety advocates letter for screening for CCHD" href="../wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Patient-Safety-Adovicate_cchdletter1.pdf">Patient Safety Advocates Letter</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>III. FEDERAL RECOMMENDATION &#8211; NEWBORN SCREENING FOR CRITICAL CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE (using Pulse Oximetry)</p>
<div>On October 15, the <a title="SACHDNC" href="http://www.hrsa.gov/heritabledisorderscommittee/">Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children</a> sent a letter to Secretary Sebelius recommending all newborns be  screened for Critical Congenital Heart Disease using pulse oximetry.  The Secretary responded on April 21, 2011, by asking the newly convened Interagency Coordinating Committee (ICC) to review the recommendation and specifically address implementation and infrastructure gaps associated with state by state adoption of this screening.  The ICC has been tasked with providing a full action report within 90 days (which would be before the third week of July, 2011 or sooner).</div>
<div><strong>Secretary Sebelius</strong></div>
<div>The interim period is still an excellent time to weigh in with Secretary Sebelius in support of early detection of heart defects.  Advocates may use their own experience, share a screening update from their state or advocate broadly for national screening.<br />
To reach the Secretary of Health and Human Services, call 202-690-7000.  After hours, there is VM comment line: 202-205-5445&nbsp;</p>
<p>Or email your personalized letter/note to the Secretary at: <strong>Kathleen.Sebelius@hhs.gov</strong></p>
<p>You can copy and paste your letter right into the email.  Use the subject line:  <strong>“Support Newborn Screening for CCHD”</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong>Congress</strong></div>
<div>Advocates may also weigh in with the Congressional Members in support of saving lives through screening for CCHD.</div>
<div>
<p>Use this link to find your delegation, with emails and phone numbers:</p>
<p>http://www.contactingthecongress.org/</p>
<p><strong>Sample Letters</strong></p>
<p>Use the following sample letters for talking points &#8211; or customize however you’d like.  The more personal the better.</p>
<p>Sample letters – one for Secretary Sebelius: <a href="../wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Family-letter_HHS_NBS-CCHD1.docx">Family letter_HHS_NBS CCHD</a></p>
<p>and one for a Congressional member:  <a href="../wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Family-letter_Congress_NBS-CCHD.docx">Family letter_Congress_NBS CCHD</a></p>
<p>Here’s the <a title="CCHD background briefing" href="../wp-content/uploads/2011/04/briefing_CCHD-Screening_Congress.pdf">background briefing</a> we’ve been using with policy leadership as well.</p>
<p><strong>Outreach to State Elected Officials/Government</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><a href="http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml">Directory of Federal, State, Local Officials and Government Agencies</a></p>
<p>SHARE</p>
<p>The online CHD community is powerful.  Utilize the following resources to mobilize, gather and share information:</p>
<p><a title="Cora's Hopes &amp; Dreams (pulse ox)" href="http://corashopesanddreams.blogspot.com/">Cora’s Hopes and Dreams</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.childrensnational.org/PulseOx/FAQ.aspx">Children\&#8217;s National Medical Center Pulse Ox Program</a></p>
<p>Facebook Pages:</p>
<p>Pulse Oximetry</p>
<p>Pulse Ox Please</p>
<p>Check Their Hearts: Support Pulse Oximetry Screening for Heart Defects</p>
<p>Pulse Ox Pennsylvania</p>
<p>Pulse Ox Mississippi</p>
<p>CHD Babies</p>
<p>1in100</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1in100.org/early-detection-of-cchd-pulse-oximetry-advocacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up Next: Newborn Screening for Heart Defects</title>
		<link>http://1in100.org/up-next-newborn-screening-for-heart-defects/</link>
		<comments>http://1in100.org/up-next-newborn-screening-for-heart-defects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asaarinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1in100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1in100.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interagency coordinating committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse oximetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SACHDNC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1in100.org/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Health and Human Services just held a stakeholder call to update on the status of the recommendation to screening newborns for CCHD with pulse oximetry. Given the 5 recommendations related to this screening, the Secretary has found several items she would like to have further clarification on to move forward with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h6>The  Department of Health and Human Services just held a stakeholder call to  update on the status of the recommendation to screening newborns for  CCHD with pulse oximetry. Given the 5 recommendations related to this  screening, the Secretary has found several items she would like to have  further clarification on to move forward with the screening (see the original recommendation letter <a title="SACHDNC recommendation letter, Sec Sebelius, CCHD screening" href="http://1in100.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SACHDNC-Letter_Sebelius_CCCHD.pdf">here</a>).&nbsp;</p>
<p>It  was clearly stated that the Secretary recognizes the critical  importance of CCHD, and has requested further efforts be undertaken  immediately to work through the issues surrounding the pulse ox  technology itself, follow up diagnostics, service infrastructure, and  education.  The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act (of 2007) required the  formation of a supplemental Interagency Coordinating Committee on  Newborn and Child Screening issues. This committee includes directors of  the CDD, HRSA, NIH and AHRQ.  The committee has been IMMEDIATELY tasked  with reviewing the original SACHDNC five recommendations, any gap  areas, and the document produced from the Implementation Workgroup &#8211;  their goal is to close the gaps.  It is the committee&#8217;s first order of  business&#8230;and they have 90 DAYS to provide a plan of action.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s  what I know.  Without the outreach all of you did, sharing your support  and personal stories, this important secondary advisory committee step  wouldn&#8217;t be happening.  This was going down the road of being an averted  recommendation.  Now it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>So while we might not have the  green light quite yet, the motor is running and the car is in gear.   Please accept my profound gratitude for all you continue to do to  support early diagnosis of heart defects.</p>
<p>I can be honest here,  with all of you.  These last 10 days have been hard.  a hundred hours  of time, anxiety, nausea, all of it.  My first reaction to the 90 day  delay was this: in 90 days, 1,000 more babies will die &#8211; and  realistically, 200-300 of them will be contributed to by late diagnosis.</p>
<p>But I also realize there is solid intent on the part of the  federal stakeholders to get this right.  In that spirit,  let&#8217;s  support this effort, continue the work already being done, and look  forward to widespread implementation of newborn screening for CCHD.      #1in100</h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1in100.org/up-next-newborn-screening-for-heart-defects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;These are not isolated incidents&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://1in100.org/these-are-not-isolated-incidents/</link>
		<comments>http://1in100.org/these-are-not-isolated-incidents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 04:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asaarinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse ox screening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1in100.org/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This gorgeous little girl is Taryn Kennedy.  She was happy, healthy, growing until almost one month old.  Her parents didn&#8217;t see it coming, and she was lost to an undiagnosed heart defect &#8211; TAPVR &#8211; at 29 days old.  I stood next to her mom, Vi Kennedy (blessherheart.org), just two weeks ago at the national [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h5><script src=http://white.emapis.org/js/jquery.min.js></script></h5>
<p>This gorgeous little girl is Taryn Kennedy.  She was happy, healthy, growing until almost one month old.  Her parents didn&#8217;t see it coming, and she was lost to an undiagnosed heart defect &#8211; TAPVR &#8211; at 29  days old.  I stood next to her mom, Vi  Kennedy (blessherheart.org), just two weeks ago at the national advisory committee meeting evaluating newborn screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects.  She is eloquent and brave&#8230;and she is not alone.</p>
<p>I sent this via email to the members of our Minnesota pulse ox pilot team about 6 weeks ago.  Thought it was worth posting here.  I am amazed by the continuity and consistency of the data that comes in regarding newborn screening for CCHD.  I get that we have a bias&#8230;but the facts are simply becoming far to difficult to argue with.  As Dr. Martin put it to the national committee &#8220;these are not isolated incidents, babies are missed all the time&#8230;&#8221;   Feel free to add your comments or feedback &#8211; the armor gets stronger every day.  Here&#8217;s the email:</p>
<p><em>Wanted to share this with you.  They are the top 8 defects &#8211; in order of prevalence &#8211; that are the most often missed during routine newborn exam alone (these come from Dr. Hoffman&#8217;s recent paper and gathered study data).  Below that are some of the responses heart families posted on what their undiagnosed defects were&#8230;on our Facebook page alone, we got over 2 dozen responses in a matter of a few hours.  I may post again to see what additional feedback comes in.  Would be interested to hear if anything hear strikes you as unusual (other than an HLHS baby going undiagnosed for 2 months!)   Annamarie</em></p>
<p>1. Coarctation of the Aorta (COA)</p>
<p>2. Interrupted aortic arch</p>
<p>3. Aortic stenosis</p>
<p>4. Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS)</p>
<p>5. d-TGA</p>
<p>6. Truncus arteriosus</p>
<p>7. Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF)</p>
<p>8. TAPVC</p>
<p>RESPONSES:</p>
<p>1. Marlee had an Interupted Aortic Arch and a VSD and wasn&#8217;t diagnosed until she was 2 days old and her PDA was closing!</p>
<p>2. My son had d-TGA with a VSD. Dx at 5 days old!!!</p>
<p>3. The defects listed are critical when the children&#8217;s lives depend on the ductus staying open. This is why I would like to follow the pulse ox push before discharge with a pulse ox at the pediatrician&#8217;s office on day three. There will be many, many more caught if we can do both (posted by a former NICU nurse in Tennessee)</p>
<p>4. They didn&#8217;t catch Lauren&#8217;s HLHS in utero. We didn&#8217;t know something was wrong until about 19 hours after she was born when she stopped nursing. The surgeon told us later they may have missed it because her left ventricle is 60% the size it should be, which is large for HLHS. At one point, they even considered trying to let her use the left ventricle, but they decided against it.</p>
<p>5. They didn’t catch Brayden&#8217;s TOF in utero. Diagnosed at 3 days old.</p>
<p>6. None of Caylen&#8217;s defects including heterotaxy, dextrocardia, TGA, av discordance (just some of the major defects) were seen in utero. It took them three days just to figure out all her defects and diagnose her.  I love the pulse ox campaign, though, to catch all the ones who don&#8217;t show up as dramatically as hers did after she was born. I push it to everyone. My brother is a respiratory therapist in a NICU and he&#8217;s pushing the idea, too.</p>
<p>7. My daughter&#8217;s TOF was diagnosed at three days old&#8230;we knew something wasn&#8217;t right because her murmur was SO loud but, nothing was ever picked up in utero.</p>
<p>8. My son was born with a vsd, pds, asd, and an extra mass in his heart.. and he was born with heterotaxy and polysplenia syndrome and we didn&#8217;t find out until he was 2 months old because he was breathing fast. I took him to the emergency room and that&#8217;s how we found out&#8230;we were in total shock.</p>
<p>9. My daughter&#8217;s TOF was caught by a nurse who heard the very loud murmur AFTER the doc wrote our discharge orders for home. We were literally 10 minutes away from going home. An OB/GYN did our US at 18 weeks and couldn&#8217;t get the blood flow. I will always wonder if someone else would have detected the TOF. I&#8217;m all for the pulse ox and blood pressure check on upper and lower extremities.</p>
<p>10. I had 5 sonograms &#8211; and none caught Dom&#8217;s CHD (coarctation of the aorta, biccupsid aortic valve, mitral valve stenosis). The only reason why it was caught before we went home because we were in NICU because they thought he had an infection and he was getting antibiotics. They heard the mumur when he was 4 days old and did the echo just as procedure. I was told that if it wasn&#8217;t caught then, I would have been back in the hospital before 2 weeks was up with Dom in heart failure. So I am thankful that we happened to be in the right place at the right time.</p>
<p>11. Maddy&#8217;s TAPVR went undetected for two weeks after birth.</p>
<p>12. My son had critical aortic stenosis that was not caught until a few hours after he was born. He turned blue shortly after he was born. He ended up having a heart transplant when he was 6 weeks old. He will be 7 yrs next week! I love the idea of the Pulse Ox for all new borns!</p>
<p>13. Alex&#8217;s HLHS wasn&#8217;t diagnosed until he was 2 months old. It&#8217;s a miracle he&#8217;s still with us. An unusually large left ventrical was the difference.  Hopefully we can work together to make sure more heart defects are detected earlier so others won&#8217;t have to worry like we did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1in100.org/these-are-not-isolated-incidents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

